A number of airlines are now renting out portable video-on-demand units for coach class passengers so you can watch a movie while in the air.

Typical portable video unitThis facility can help to pass the time, particularly on longer flights.

I would like to issue a word of warning however!

A common experience amongst passengers using these units is that they fail to reach the end of the movie before the cabin crew pass through the cabin explaining that  it is time to re-configure the cabin for landing.

This can often happen up to 20 minutes before touchdown.

You should therefore do the following:

  • get hold of your video unit as soon as possible after takeoff
  • find out what movies are going to finish before the unit is likely to be taken away
  • if you pause the playback, keep in mind the impact on the finishing time of the movie.

If you follow these steps, you will be a lot less likely to suffer the frustration of not finding out “whodunit” by the end of the flight.

Submitted by John Kumm www.onlinetravelconsultant.com

Categories : Air, Technology, Vacations
Comments (0)

Should consumers of travel promotional material expect that graphic images representing a destination be a true representation of the actual travel experience?

One would hope so, but occasionally images used are not exactly what they seem.

Kayakers with DolphinsThe latest such incident has been reported by New Zealand’s Sunday Star Times http://www.stuff.co.nz/sundaystartimes/4034294a6442.html . It appears that whilst the title of the New Zealand tourist campaign is 100% Pure New Zealand, some of the photographs that have been used in the promotions are not quite 100% pure! The photograph above of two kayakers enjoying the company of dolphins is apparently a digital reconstruction of two photos – one of the kayakers, and another of the dolphins.

Such modification of images has been defended by representatives of Tourism New Zealand because they do not materially alter the reality of tourism in that country.

Perhaps not on that occasion, but there have been a number of other misleading (and perhaps more serious) blemishes noted recently. Previous such cases have included the use by Fiji of images of the Cook Islands for promotional purposes in the 1990s, and in early 2000 a district in the United Kingdom used images from the South Island of New Zealand to promote its tourism.
Royal Nepal Airlines recently apologized to Peru for promoting Nepalese tourism under the heading “Have You Seen Nepal?” but using an image of Machu Picchu, perhaps the most iconic attraction in all of South America.

Things are perhaps not always quite as they seem!

Submitted by John Kumm www.onlinetravelconsultant.com

Comments (0)

Potential travelers are very strongly advised to check up on the level and type of cover offered by Travel Insurance companies as a result of recent terrorism related security clampdowns.

Whilst almost all insurers offering travel insurance have exclusions for terrorism related events, there is currently a variation in the definition of what constitutes a terrorism related violent action.

As an example, some policies define terrorism to include “violent acts, the treat of violence used by a person or organization to promote their cause or beliefs”, some even include military force used to combat terrorist acts.

Other insurance policies are more specific, defining terrorism as “an act done with the intention of developing a political, ideological or religious cause, and with the intention of influencing by intimidation, the government of a country”.

Another issue relates to the standard exclusion of cover for personal valuable items such as cameras, computers, etc held in the hold of an aircraft from insurance policies. As a result of the new guidelines currently being enforced in the UK, where such items are prohibited from carriage in the cabin, you should check with your insurer to determine whether this clause has been temporarily removed.

Some commentators have suggested that less than half of travelers into and out of the UK are potentially likely to have insurance claims as a result of the recent events for disrupted travel, hotel cancellations, etc honored by travel insurers.

This seems to relate to a very narrow interpretation by travel insurance underwriters of whether the delays are as a result of terrorism, or of attempts to prevent terrorism.

Categories : Air, Security, Uncategorized
Comments (0)